Right after 9/11, I was interviewed by Fox News for a new story on flying cars. “Perish the thought of bin Laden in a Skycar,” I was quoted as saying (I do not remember saying this). My opinion on flying cars is not popular with devotees but I stand by the basic argument–is there any persuasive reason these two forms of transportation need to be merged when each technology works perfectly well on its own?
The latest flying car to get some media buzz is the Terrafugia Transition. It looks absolutely whiz-bang but I noticed it is being promoted as a sports aviation vehicle, a far cry from the futuristic fantasies of the past. Perhaps we’ve downsized our flying car dreams.
Here’s the original Retrofuture article I wrote back in 1999:
Like so many other stories profiled in the Retro Future, the ConvAIRCAR flying car was a noble but doomed attempt to push the boundaries of what is possible.
On paper, the ConvAIRCAR was truly the stuff of commuters’ fantasies. It had “all the advantages of a Cadillac” according to its manufacturer. So what happened? The same thing that happens to all flying cars–the dream crashed and burned before it could take off…this time literally.
The ConvAIRCAR was not the first flying car to make it to the drawing board. That honor goes to the Curtiss Autoplane of 1917. But public interest in a car-plane hybrid didn’t take hold until after World War II. Airplane manufacturers, after the war, were shifting away from military aircraft to consumer production lines.
The Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Company of San Diego, California was one of those companies looking for a new outlet to sell their aircraft. Sensing the time was right for a flying car, they poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into developing a prototype built by aerodynamic engineer Theodore P. Hall.
Also lending a hand was Henry Dreyfuss, one of the outstanding industrial designers of the 20th century. Dreyfuss designed telephones for Bell, tractors for John Deere, thermostats for Honeywell, and cameras for Polaroid. But a flying car? What motivated the famously no-nonsense Dreyfuss–a devotee of Louis Sullivan’s dictum that “form follows function”–to lend his talents to such a far-fetched endeavor? The cynic would say money; but, in truth, a flying car didn’t seem that far-fetched at the time.
“The market for this flying automobile will be far greater than a conventional light plane,” Consolidated Vultee promised, “because the purchasers can obtain daily use from the car to get more out of his investment.” The estimated cost: $1,500. Flight attachments were an additional cost.
These attachments were integral to the ConvAIRCAR’s design. After driving to the airport, an owner had to connect a flight unit (which included a propeller) to take off. At the next airport they simply removed the detachable wings and drove away in what was an otherwise ordinary car.
Well, not exactly ordinary. Thanks to a “plastic-impregnated” fiberglass body that weighed only 725 pounds, the ConvAIRCAR achieved an astounding 45 miles per gallon. And it looked great–the aerodynamic envelope of “the only automobile that flies” was a remarkable achievement, truly years ahead of its time.
On November 17, 1947, the New York Times announced the news: a prototype of the ConvAIRCAR had circled San Diego for one hour and 18 minutes. These trials confirmed the best hopes of Consolidate Vultee. But success was short-lived. A few days after the test flight, a pilot crash-landed the ConvAIRCAR in the desert (it was later discovered a gas gauge had accidentally been shut off) and the only prototype in existence was demolished beyond repair.
Eventually another model of the ConvAIRCAR was built but the damage was done. The high cost of production and the limited market potential–not to mention the negative publicity–spelled doom (sadly no examples of the ConvAIRCAR survive; the second prototype perished in a fire at the San Diego Air & Space Museum).
The failure of the ConvAIRCAR was not unique. Dozens of inventors and aerodynamic engineers have tried to create similar vehicles in the last fifty years–none has successfully marketed a flying car. According to a 1989 article in Smithsonian, over 30 patents for flying cars have been filed this century in the United States alone; usually boasting fanciful names like Aerocar, Autoplane, Airphibian, and Skycar.
To this day several obstacles stand in the path of launching a successful flying car. First, the FAA is not likely to grant airspace to these vehicles–congestion in the air is bad enough. Secondly, flying cars, traditionally, have suffered from an engineering problem: as cars they are overpowered, as planes they are underpowered. And, last, the insurance is certain to be prohibitively expensive.
No, sadly, you will not be able to jump into a flying car for a quick trip 
to the 7-11 in the year 2000. But as long as “The Jetsons” is still running on the Cartoon Network, these dream machines will undoubtedly live on.
Tags: Convaircar, Henry Dreyfuss
I can’t believe you say that each technology works perfectly on it’s own! Sure aviation works quite well but that is so strictly regulated. Cars and personal transport??? So many with complete disregard for the basic rules of driving, so many with an inability to drive, so many with complete abandon for others on the road, so many deaths on the roads. No, the car technology is far from working perfectly. It works well up until the point people sit in behind the wheel.
It’s true we won’t ever fly ourselves to the shop. But you look at the concept of a flying car with such a small mind. You think that we will emulate what we already do with road cars except we will be a few hundred metres higher. Where as in reality it will be the cars that will fly us to the shops. An automated means of controlling flying cars. It makes perfect sense. Flying in a three dimensional space provides a lack of need for road infrastructure. It increase the distance between vehicles. Rids a lot of traffic congestion. Having the process automated means the person no longer controls the car, a machine does. Reducing to almost zero the factor of human error, completey removes impatientness and frustration as commonly seen on the roads (causing accidents). Basically it removes everything from personal transport that makes it dangerous (the person).
People keep looking at this topic trying to draw parallels to what exists to the technology and methods that exist. Not looking at it in terms of how it will exist. The fail safe technologies required aren’t at the stage needed to implement something like this. But the can be and the will be.
Expand your narrow minds and think to the future. We will have flying cars. Not in our life time. But some day, certainly.
My car does work perfectly well. Its success rate for going from point A to point B is outstanding. It is not a gas guzzler, it is safe and efficient (at least by today’s standards). Fortunately every airplane I’ve traveled on has taken off and landed successfully. Both technologies are not perfected but then few are. I think if we’re going to see automated transportation in the future it would much more likely be in the guise of a People Mover or some sort of automated highway system. Both are much more likely to succeed on terra firma–the former as public transportation, the latter as a way to eliminate human error–before your vaunted flying cars will be whizzing around in their perfected glory. I mean I like to indulge in a science fiction (un)reality as much as the next person but it is pure indulgence to imagine we will overcome the obstacles of implementing a massive flying car transportation infrastructure in anything resembling the near future. To say with certainty that the day is coming is naivety bordering on willing suspension of disbelief (to be kind) or delusion (to not be kind). Listen anyone can make those kind of arguments. Scratch the surface of flying car boosterism and you begin to recognize a pattern that borders on husksterism. The same stories appear year after year and I’m not immune to their charms but I’d like to see one of these Kool-Aid drinkers put their own $200,000 on a downpayment.
Yourflyingcarisnotrealistic@narrowminds.com
The photo of the ConvAIRCAR flying car is quite reminiscent of the one Scaramanga used in the James Bond film “The Man with the Golden Gun.”
This is the first time I commented here and I must say you provide genuine, and quality information for other bloggers! Great job.
p.s. You have an awesome template . Where have you got it from?
It’s called Kubrick.
The following invaluable domain names:
FlyingCars.mobi
CelestialCars.com
AerialCars.com
After the successful test run of Terrafugia Flying cars recently,
flying cars are expected to reach the market by 2010. The term Celestial refers
to the sky and/or Heaven. The flying cars are roadable aircrafts that
can fly in the air and also move on the road like the regular cars.
Celestial Cars/ Flying Cars/ Aerial Cars are no new concept; the details of existance of such
roadable aircrafts are discussed in many literature. For details about the Celestial Cars/ Aerial Cars
in Literature, pl visit our website http://www.celestialcars.com.
If you are willing to buy the above two domains, pl reply me with your offer to admin@oxfordcorporation.com.
Regards
Car Domain Monster
Visit worldcasinosdirectory.net for unlimited entertainment.
I’m still waiting for someone to invent teleportation!