Retrofuture.com

Where Yesterday’s Tomorrow Is Still the Future.

Archive for January, 2009

The Dymaxion World of Buckminster Fuller

Friday, January 30th, 2009

I finally had a chance to see a prototype Dymaxion car last year at a Buckminster Fuller exhibit at the Whitney Museum of American Art. It was impressive to behold.  Here’s an original piece I wrote in 1999.  If ever there was a hero of the Retrofuture, it would have to be Bucky.

bucky1If R. Buckminster Fuller had been pulling the strings of corporate America, it’s possible we would be living in a world of three-wheel cars, aluminum houses, and domed cities.Fuller never enjoyed that kind of power or authority. In fact, a good deal of his 24 patents and many other improbable schemes came to nothing. But Bucky—as he was universally known—was destined to be ahead of his time.

Born in Massachusetts in 1895, Bucky was a maverick thinker who spent much of his life on a personal crusade to improve the human condition. “Think about it,” he once explained, “we are blessed with technology that would be indescribable to our forefathers. We have the wherewithal, the know-it-all, to feed everybody, clothe everybody, give every human on Earth a chance. We now know what we could never have known before–that we now have an option for all humanity to ‘make it’ successfully on this planet and in this lifetime.”

bucky2Bucky’s agenda was to do more with less. He wanted to do it in a Dymaxion—or DYnamic MAXimum ION—world. That sounded futuristic but the term Dymaxion actually meant nothing. It had been coined in 1929 by a department store’s publicity agent to describe an in-store display of Bucky’s new 4D House. To give the house a more “mainstream” name, the PR man invented the term Dymaxion, which became a trademark associated with some of Bucky’s most imaginative projects.

The 4D Dymaxion House not only sounded futuristic, it was futuristic. The ingenious design—which revolved around a central “mast” that contained plumbing and other essentials—challenged nearly every theory about housing construction. It also proved to be Bucky’s ticket to fame. The public was enraptured, historian Joseph J. Corn explains in “Yesterday’s Tomorrows.” “Fuller’s Dymaxion House,” writes Corn, “brought the concept of the home of tomorrow to the forefront of the popular and professional consciousness.”bucky3The key issues addressed by Bucky’s “house of the future” were important questions of self-sustainability, mass-production, pre-fabrication, and automation.

Another component was mobility–the 4D Dymaxion was literally a mobile home, light enough to be transported by dirigible. Utilizing aluminum as his main material, Bucky assured the house would be lightweight, waterproof, fireproof and cheap.

It may have seemed brilliant, but the 4D Dymaxion House never did fly. Several prototypes were produced but nothing on the scale that Bucky had imagined. Only the Dymaxion Bathroom–a sheet-metal stamped curiosity—managed to sell a few units in a limited production. The biggest problem, besides a few technical issues, were the banks, who refused to loan money for the project. This was a pattern which appeared throughout Bucky’s career, but it never slowed his productivity.

bucky4In 1933, Bucky dedicated himself to building the Dymaxion car, a three-wheeled automobile which allowed a driver to make a 360 degree turn on a dime. Modeled after the rudder on a ship, the rearwheel steering mechanism gave a driver an amazing amount of maneuverability. It was possible to move sideways into a parking spot if necessary. And if extra visibility was needed, a periscope came out of the roof for some added perspective.

Only three Dymaxion cars were ever produced. One of them was purchased by famed orchestra conductor Leopold Stokowski. Another person willing to invest money was Amelia Earhart. But financial constraints forced Bucky to curtail his plans. Once again, obstacles stood in his path. One of these problems was completely unforeseen: the car caused a traffic jam wherever it went. In the book “Bucky Works,” author J. Baldwin explains how Bucky’s teardrop-shaped aluminum automobile had people dropping their jaws in amazement. He describes a drive up New York streets by Bucky “which gridlocked a significant portion of midtown Manhattan. Excluded from the annual auto show at Madison Square Garden, Bucky parked his car near the street entrance, effectively upstaging Detroit’s finest.”bucky5

But any lingering hope the Dymaxion might go into full-scale production was dashed when the car was involved in a fatal accident at the 1933 Chicago World’s Fair. The car’s design was later exonerated but the negative publicity proved fatal.The Dymaxion name must have seemed cursed to everybody except Bucky because he was already busy at work on Dymaxion World Map. Using his self-taught skills as a cartographer, Bucky had fashioned a unique “flat” view of Earth which demonstrated how the geometry of geodesic–or curved–surfaces provided navigators with the most efficient routes of voyages on the open seas.

This intellectual exercise played a crucial role in Bucky’s most famous creation: the geodesic dome. The map strengthened Bucky’s resolve that geodesic lines—the shortest line between two points that lies on a given surface—were the most efficient way of enclosing space. After experimenting with a pattern of tetrahedrons (triangular pyramids), Bucky discovered he could create a dome whose structural integrity was extraordinary but which was also incredibly light.bucky6It was also incredibly striking. The geodesic dome became an instantly recognizable icon. Probably the most famous Bucky dome was the landmark created at the Expo ’67 fair in Montreal. It has been estimated that 200,000 geodesic domes have been created since Bucky’s breakthrough, which means his buildings occupy more space than any other living architect.

The phenomenon of geodesic domes elevated Bucky’s status and he became, in his elder years, a familiar face on college campuses, an animated figure talking in a rapid clip to spellbound audiences. Some saw “the planet’s friendly genius” as slightly eccentric; others were enthralled.

Bucky provided an inspirational message for beginners; after all, he proved that a self-taught architect, engineer, philosopher, map-maker, car-builder, and house-designer could, with a lot of perseverance, become a celebrated figure who won 47 honorary doctorates. That’s right, we forgot to tell you: Bucky never earned a college degree.bucky7“In the year 2000,” Bucky once predicted, “mankind will either have destroyed itself or used its brain in a very big way.” Like everything about Buckminster Fuller, the accuracy of this observation remains to be judged–perhaps, in the 21st Century. At a particular gleeful moment Bucky once declared “I have discovered the coordinates of the Universe” and who are we to doubt him? Everywhere you look, Bucky lives.

Will Virtual Dogs Replace Man’s Best Friend?

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

I haven’t heard much about AIBO in the ten years since this article was published.

dog3For most of the 20th Century, we’ve been hearing about the arrival of a robot dog—a docile and obedient machine which never has an accident on the rug, never barks at the postman, and never mounts the legs of stranger in inappropriate ways.

Finally, this year, in a blaze of publicity, Sony announced it had created the legendary machine—a fully autonomous “entertainment robot” named AIBO.

Equipped with a 180,000 pixel camera (hidden in its nose) and an infrared distance sensor to detect objects, AIBO is programmed to climb stairs and sing songs. Best of all, it never blows you away with dog breath.

dog6bSony says it developed AIBO with “the aim of bringing human and robots closer together.” But, thus far, the bark hasn’t lived up to the byte. Most people still prefer the company of their imperfect, non-mechanical dogs and cats.

Nevertheless, AIBO does represent a significant leap forward in the development of autonomous robots as a commercial venture.

And judging from brisk sales (a limited-edition run of 5000 robot dogs was snapped up almost instantaneously by collectors last summer at $2500 a pop), AIBO is here to stay. Robot enthusiasts expect more breeds to follow.

dog2Although the role of man’s best friend seems secure for the time being, historically speaking, the emergence of AIBO and other robots could change their vaunted status.

Just as a horse was associated with strength (aka, horsepower) until automobiles came along, it’s plausible that the loyalty of a dog could be replaced by the affection of a robot.

AIBO is designed to ingratiate itself to its human masters by replicating the precise traits of a dog (like wagging its tail) while creating new ways of communication (musical tones, colored lights in its eyes). Furthermore, owners can rest assured that AIBO will not bite the hand that feeds it (at least not intentionally).

dog4Like R2-D2 and C-3PO in Star Wars, AIBO is designed to be a benevolent machine. Models are equipped with a touch sensor that allow owners to administer affection as well as discipline if warranted.

“Pet AIBO gently to tell it that you are happy,” instructs a Sony press release, “(or give it) a little smack on the head and AIBO will understand that you are scolding it.”

AIBO’s sophisticated programming allows it to “think and feel for itself,” its creators claim, with “instincts” and “emotions” like a real dog.

The question is: when, if ever, will advanced machine intelligence begin to replace the “pure bred” dogs and cats we know and love? Nolan Bushnell (the “father” of Atari and Chuckie Cheese) was once asked this question back in the early 1980s when he was marketing one of the first commercially marketed home robots called Brains on Board (or BOB).

dog5Asked about what effect BOB would have on dogs, Bushnell joked, “They’ll become curiosities, like old cars.”

But as fate would have it, it was BOB (left) who became a curiosity. As Bushnell found out, there is no guarantee that people will automatically open their doors to a robot, no matter how human (or dog-like) they appear to be.

Will AIBO suffer the same fate as BOB? Will it become just the latest in a long line of novelty robots? History is already littered with dead-tech prototypes with names like Cosmo, Klatuu, Dottie, and Hero.

AIBO may fare better than its robotic ancestors if early indications are anymeasure. Perhaps it will even give birth to mechanical offspring in the future.

dog1Real dogs? Their loyalty is not in question. But ours is. In the end, if we betray man’s best friend, we might be staring at the nuts and bolts of our own obsolescence.

Fallout Shelters–The Atomic Home

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

Another of the original Retrofuture articles from 1999, this was inspired by Y2K hysteria.

fallout2Before you supersize your Y2K kit you might want to consider fallout shelters. Those abandoned underground relics of the Atomic Age are a timely reminder of what happens when talk of doomsday scenarios spooks the public.

“I think, in retrospect, people were throwing their money away,” reflects historian Alan Brinkley on the value of fallout shelters. And Brinkley, a professor of history at Columbia University, ought to know.

His own family built a shelter in the basement of their Chevy Chase, Maryland home complete with a chemical toilet, canned goods and sleeping bags.

“There wasn’t the faintest chance anybody would have been able to survive,” laughs Brinkley. But given the Cold War climate “people who knew better were likely to make some concessions to the hysteria.”

fallout6Although his family’s effort was “half-hearted,” Brinkley (whose father David is the well-known broadcaster) recalls the dire atmosphere. “Most people believed that it was right to do something to prepare for nuclear war,” he recalls.

In contrast to the government’s bland reassurances regarding the Y2K problem, John F. Kennedy urged citizens to seriously consider building a fallout shelter in case of nuclear war.

Brinkley notes the difference between the two eras. “In the 1950s, everybody was scared of nuclear war,” he explains, “but beyond that people had a basic faith in government and in technology.”

fallout4Not so today, says Brinkley: “There is so much less faith, not just in government but, in this case, in technology, than the 1950s. Today people are much less inclined to believe assurances that the problem is under control.”

When fears of an atomic holocaust mushroomed during the Cold War, many citizens felt they had no choice but to prepare for the worst case scenario. Although the two superpowers never fired their weapons, even if they had, experts agreed, a fallout shelter would have done little to prolong long-term survival of its occupants.

Still, millions of dollars were spent on the estimated 200,000 shelters that were built and then abandoned after war fears subsided. Many millions more were spent by the U.S. government on Civil Defense fallout shelters.

fallout3Although the anxiety level is similar in regard to Y2K, it appears that most people are not digging holes in their backyards. But, as Brinkley notes, “there’s a tremendous receptivity to conspiracy theories and the idea of great catastrophes lurking around the corner.”

A telling gauge of the current state of panic is the rise of Y2K-related scams. Consumer Reports recently issued a warning to readers to be on the look-out for opportunists trying to cash in on the escalating fears. “While anticipating inconveniences is appropriate, “panicky stockpiling of essentials is not,” writes the magazine.

fallout1Perhaps, in the future, people will write about the history of Y2K as they do about the Cold War—a time of panic, unreason, anxiety, and, ultimately, calm and relief. Compared to the threat of an all-out nuclear war, the disruption of a few computer systems may seem relatively benign.

But then doomsday is always nigh. “There’s enough publicity about the problem,” Brinkley says, “that many people are instinctively inclined to believe the worst.

Kraftwerk Live

Monday, January 26th, 2009

kraftwerkWhen I first heard Kraftwerk in the 1970s they vaguely threatened my post-hippie ethos that only acoustically-created music was valid. I didn’t quite get it. Fortunately that phase didn’t last too long and by the 80s I had fallen in love with their classic  “The Man-Machine” album. I was lucky to catch the group’s live act at the Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City in 1998, a brilliant synthesis of sound and vision that cemented them in my mind as the Retrofuture band of all-time.

Playing electronic instruments on a minimalistic set of blinking diodes straight out of the War Room scenes in “Dr. Strangelove,” the purposely anonymous musicians disappeared at the end of the set to be replaced by androids fashioned in their image. Now that’s what I call fun! Their pioneering music holds up not just in the field of electronic dance music but its influence on rap  (Afrika Bambaattaa’s proto-rap hit “Planet Rock” sampled Kraftwerk’s “Trans-Europe Express”).

This week Pitchfork.tv is showing Kraftwerk’s live DVD “Minimum-Maximum” for free but it looks like the Y2K crisis has messed up the link. I found an excerpt on You Tube:  Kraftwerk’s Man-Machine

Harley Earl’s Dream Car: The Firebird III

Saturday, January 24th, 2009

Dream cars come and dream cars go but Harley Earl’s Firebird III lives on. This is another Retrofuture original from 1999.dreamcar1

In the recent hit film Minority Report, Tom Cruise drives a nifty Lexus sports car designed by conceptual artist Herald Belker. Belker’s dream machine is making a splash on the car show circuit but, for all its sleek zoomy-ness, its technological achievements don’t hold a candle to the original retro-rocket: Harley Earl’s Firebird III.dreamcar2With seven aerodynamic fins and a double-canopy cockpit, the Firebird III was 1958′s “car of the future.” Over four decades later, the car’sconceptual underpinnings are still radically ahead-of-their-time.

The Firebird III was chock full of space-age innovations: special drag brakes which emerged from flat panels to slow the car at high speeds, an “ultra-sonic” key which signaled the body panel (i.e., the doors) to swing open, an automated guidance system to avoid accidents and “no hold” steering.

dreamcar3Created under the auspices of Harley Earl (pictured left), the Firebird prototypes represented the pinnacle of automotive styling during the golden age of General Motors.

Earl was greatly influenced by the advances in aerospace engineering. The so-called “father of the tail fin” was convinced the future of car design must incorporate aerodynamic principles. Dazzled by Lockheed’s cutting-edge P-38 (below), Earl assembled a group of go-for-broke engineers and mandated they conjure up something spectacular.

dream5One of these prototypes, the Firebird III, was the apotheosis of the concept car. With its sleek projectile appearance, the Firebird III pushed the outer limits of what was then possible.

Designed by a team that included Bob McLean (who later worked on the infamous DeLorean), Norm James, and Bill Porter, the revved-up Bat-like car conveyed an unrivalled sense of speed.

dreamcar4Underneath the hood there were some truly revolutionary ideas. One was Unicontrol, a mouse-like instrument which substituted for steering-wheel, transmission, throttle and brake (shifting it left turned the car left, shifting it right turned the car right, back applied the brakes and forward put the car into reverse).

Another innovation was “Autoglide,” an automated guidance system which took in the event of human error. In theory (it was never actually constructed) a low frequency-powered cable underneath “highways of the future” provided remote guidance; using antennas to sense signals, the Firebird III’s position on the highway could be programmed to avoid accidents.

Just in case there was one last safety measure: a TV camera mounted on the rear of the Firebird III transmitted live pictures to small screens visible to the driver.

dreamcar6Before utility won the day, Harley Earl created a new frontier in aerodynamic car design. This aesthetic, reawakened, shows no sign of slowing down anytime soon. These days, even your pedestrian grocery-getter sports some kind of whoosh. They all owe a debt to Earl.