Retrofuture.com

Where Yesterday’s Tomorrow Is Still the Future.

The Vocoder: Sound of the New Millennium

June 6th, 2010

If anything the vocoder has become more of a fixture in popular music in the ten years since this article was published.

voc3

A little-known inventor named Homer Dudley has pumped new life into the career of Cher. Sixty years before her comeback single “Believe,” Dudley invented the vocoder, the device which recently transformed Cher’s singing voice into a robotic-like timbre.

The origin of vocoder is far removed from the world of pop music–originally Dudley was hoping to improve phone service. But he quickly ascertained that the vocoder (or voice coder) possessed a creative potential far beyond the transmission of phone calls. In fact, the device proved to be of crucial importance World War II, scrambling transoceanic conversations between Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill.

Years later it was resurrected by hipster musicians looking to lend a futuristic ambience to a track including Laurie Anderson (“O, Superman”),  Kraftwerk (“We Are the Robots”) and the Beastie Boys (“Intergalactic”).

voc1But it’s safe to say Dudley had something less glamorous in mind when he invented the device at Bell Labs in 1936.

Dudley had a long and productive career as a researcher into the nature of speech and its transmission,” points out Sheldon Hochheiser, corporate historian of the AT&T Archives. “The vocoder is his best known achievement.”

How did his invention work? Dudley discovered that if you broke speech down into its basic components they could be transmitted over a narrow bandwidth. He designed an electronic device that took speech signals, divided them into component parts, analyzed them through a filter, and then re-synthesized them at the receiving end.

In effect, Dudley had figured out how to synthesize sounds. And, thus, he quickly ascertained the vocoder (or voice coder) had creative potential beyond the transmission of phone calls.

voc2To publicize his breakthrough, he created an offshoot called the Voder for the 1939 World’s Fair in New York. Using a trained operator who manually pressed keys to produce sounds, the Voder (or voice operation demonstrator) could transmit complete intelligible sentences and imitate the sound of various farm animals.

The public was reportedly mesmerized. “The Voder can do practically anything the human voice can do,” claimed the New York Times in a front page article in early 1939, “from producing the lowest pitch of eight or ninety cycles to overtones up to almost 10,000 cycles. It can also sing.”

The musical capabilities of the vocoder took a backseat to more pressing matters during World War II. But the device proved to be of crucial importance, scrambling transoceanic conversations between Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill.

voc5After the war, electronic music pioneers such as Karlheinz Stockhausen began to recognize the vocoder’s musical potential, employing the device in experimental compositions. In 1971, the vocoder entered the pop culture mainstream when Kubrick invited composer Wendy Carlos to score the music to his controversial adaptation of Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange. Employing a vocoder to “sing” on “Timesteps,” Carlos produced a classic of early electronic music.

A product of the communications revolution, the vocoder has become a perfect fit for artists seeking a “new millennium” sound. Its trance-like effect has elements of human warmth but also a decidedly metallic tone.

More recently, the otherworldy effect has shown up in work of Air, Daft Punk, and Beck. But it took Cher’s hit “Believe” to bring the vocoder to the fore of popular music. Reportedly, Cher’s producers were initially reluctant to use the vocal effect. The pop diva held firm, insisting they could change it over her dead body. “And that,” Cher told the New York Times “was the end of the discussion.”

Time will tell if we’ll thank Cher or curse her but thanks the vocoder has gone from a relatively obscure invention by a guy named Homer Dudley to becoming the sound of 1999.

Let Them Eat Fake!

May 11th, 2010

This is an original Retrofuture article from 1999 which later lead me to become a space food entrepreneur…but that’s a different story for another time.

fake1

Long a dream of futurists and food scientists, nutritional substitutes—whether they be energy bars, diet shakes, or, that old favorite, food pills—have traditionally left a bad taste in the collective taste bud.

Why can’t they make a good food pill? According to Manfred Kroger, Professor of Food Science at Pennsylvania State University, they can. “Theoretically it’s possible,” says Kroger, “but the public looks at food pills as too coercive, too futuristic, too monotonous.”

fake2Besides, food pills, Kroger adds, are already here in different forms: “You could look at vitaminized-mineralized breakfast cereal as eating food pills.” Count Chochula a food pill? If it were only that easy. To get the 2000 kilocalories we need to eat everyday, Kroger explains, would require “a pill of close to a pound.” Now try washing that down with some milk.

Still, it’s unlikely food pills will go away anytime soon. The reason: “technological eating,” as Kroger terms it, “would guarantee almost total food safety.” Furthermore, he adds, “We could augment it with all sorts of pharmaceutical additives, which is a hot subject these days.”

fake3The concept of “technological eating” may be hot but the public perception of synthetic food is not. There is a general resistance to putting alien food stuffs in our bodies (witness the protests of the European community to bio-engineered foods).

The fears associated with fake food were illustrated in classic fashion at the close of the 1970s eco-disaster cult flick Soylent Green when an overwrought Charlton Heston realizes the mysterious substance the starving masses have been eating is people.

“Soon they’ll be breeding us like cattle!” Heston begins shouting. “You’ve got to warn everyone and tell them! Soylent green is made of people! You’ve got to tell them! Soylent green is people!”

fake4The first brave souls (aka, guinea pigs) to taste something that resembled food pills were the astronauts. In the early 1960s, NASA contacted several leading food conglomerates hoping to come up with new and innovative ways of feeding astronauts on long-duration space missions.

The result was “food powder”—a nutritionally complete meal of freeze-dried food that was rehydrated in space and consumed through straws. To which astronauts responded: Soylent green is people!

Almost everyone agreed that space food was a pale imitation of the real thing. “The gourmet’s nightmare of a more distant future” as The Wall Street Journal concluded in 1966.

fake5Orbiting the Earth in zero gravity, astronauts faced an unappetizing choice of bite-sized cubes covered with edible gelatin or a semi-liquid food puree squeezed out of a toothpaste-like tube.

What did the astronauts think about the culinary offerings? One headline probably summed it up best: “Space Food Hideous—But It Costs A Lot.”

fake6To avoid the atrocious offerings, a stronaut John W. Young (right) smuggled a corned beef sandwich aboard the five-hour Gemini 3 flight on March 23, 1965. Consumed by mission mate Virgil I. “Gus” Grissom, the contraband sandwich resulted in a Congressional investigation and the first official reprimand of an astronaut.

Space food had to improve and it did. By the time Apollo 11′s Neil A. Armstrong and Edwin E. “Buzz” Aldrin, Jr. sat down for the first meal on the moon, they were able to chow down on a spread of hot dogs, bacon squares and canned peaches. Well, it beat beef in a tube.

fake7The public? They wanted to try space food. General Foods, which marketed Tang, was best-positioned to take advantage. Tang had been on every Gemini and Apollo mission and General Foods quickly launched an all-out advertising blitz that ensured Tang would become synonymous with space travel itself.

The space-crazed public found Tang new and exciting (after all, why would anybody want to drink real orange juice?). Actually, Tang wasn’t new—it had been on supermarket shelves since 1959. That mattered little to kids watching the space missions on TV. Tang was the beverage of the gods, and when they demanded it, parents had little choice but to comply.

fake8Tang’s well-publicized splash convinced Pillsbury to get into the space food business as well. NASA had already asked Pillsbury to create an edible food snack which would not break apart and contaminate the delicate environment of a space capsule. Their response was to create a high-protein cereal which made its debut on Scott Carpenter’s five hour Mercury flight on May 24, 1962. The snack proved successful and, several permutations later, an improved version,  a chewy “energy stick,” won a place on the historic Apollo 11 moon landing.

fake9Pillsbury used their role on Apollo 11 as a launching pad for a spin-off which they imaginatively dubbed Space Food Sticks. The Tootsie Roll-like candy came in several flavors including caramel, chocolate, malt, mint, orange and the ever-popular peanut butter.

Aficionados will recall that the Space Food Sticks came wrapped in special foil to give them a space age look. The front of each pack featured an illustration of an anonymous astronaut happily chomping on a Space Food Stick. The box clarified the important role the development sticks played “in support of the U.S. Aerospace Program.”

It turns out Pillsbury’s aggressive marketing ruffled a few a feathers in the nation’s capital. One year after Space Food Sticks were introduced, the Bureau of Deceptive Practices undertook an investigation of Pillsbury’s claim they were “ounce for ounce” as nutritious as milk. A document issued by the company in response–available at NASA’s archives—asserted the snacks were “suitable as total food replacement” in the unlikely chance that no other foods were available.

fake10Space food never really caught on. Novelties like Moon Cheeze (right) were fun, but the idea of floating around in zero gravity trying to satiate your appetite on strawberry food cubes was better in theory than the dinner plate.

Eventually, and perhaps inevitably, the brief vogue of space food novelties subsided. Space Food Sticks yielded their cutting-edge status to Pop Rocks and other forms of “techno-candy.”

Freeze-dried meals can be found at camping stores and are sold as souvenirs at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum and other museum gift shops.

fake11As for Tang, it won an unexpected boost in 1998 when Ohio senator John Glenn requested it for his return to space. In 1962, Glenn had been the first American astronaut to perform “eating experiments” in orbit, so his desire for a second round was only natural. After all, if anything was going to quench the thirst of a senior citizen space hero, it had to be Tang.

The next step in food science? It may be “Micro-M.R.E.’s,” meal tablets with enough calories to sustain a soldier in the battlefield for 24 hours. According to Air Force 2025, a study of future military concepts conducted by the Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base, M.R.E.‘s are being developed.fake12

Also in the works: transdermal patches that will allow soldiers to feed themselves through their skin. The “transdermal nutrient delivery system” is currently being studied by the Department of Defense Combat Feeding Program.


Photographs (top to bottom): Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA; ©MGM, from the collection of Eric Lefcowitz; Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA; from the collection of Ed Finn; Courtesy of NASA; Courtesy of NASA / Retromail / Back to Home / © 2009 Eric Lefcowitz

Rocket Man by the Spotniks

May 6th, 2010

Brighten up your Friday with the space-age surf sounds of Sweden’s Spotniks and their insanely catchy “Rocket Man.” Dig the space suits! Thanks to Michael Bennet of the Dupont Circles for helping me track this down.


Smell-O-Vision

May 5th, 2010

A recent Wired headline reads “Researchers Want to Add Touch, Taste and Smell to Virtual Reality.” I detect the faint odor of wishful thinking. Here’s an original 1999 Retrofuture post that looks at the first attempt at Smell-O-Vision.

scent2In the 1950s, Hans Laube, a Swiss professor of osmics (the study of smells) created a process for reproducing odors in a movie theater. The invention—which came to be known as Smell-O-Vision—was introduced in the 1960 film Scent of Mystery.

The idea of using smells in movies—i.e., making a “smellie”—had been a long-anticipated development in cinema. Newspaper advertisements for Scent of Mystery claimed its significance in film history: “First They Moved (1895)! Then They Talked (1927)! Now They Smell!”

Did Smell-O-Vision make olfactory sense? Not too many people thought so. But at least one influential backer did, Michael Todd Sr., the producer of Around the World in 80 Days, who first saw Laube demonstrate his invention in 1954.

Todd was a theatrical impresario, an Oscar-winning-producer, and a consummate showman who was interested in anything that might maintain an audience’s attention. Among the many movie techniques he helped pioneer was the wide-screen movie format known as Cinerama (Mike Todd, Jr. shot the winding, twisting, vertigo-inducing rollercoaster ride in 1952′s This is Cinerama).

Always on the lookout for the next innovation, the Todds caught a whiff of odor-meister Laube’s contraption which he called Scentavision. It was a match made in heaven. The “smellies,” like Aldous Huxley’s “feelies” in Brave New World, promised a total immersion in movie illusion.

scent41Then tragedy struck. On March 22, 1958, Michael Todd, Sr. was killed in plane accident while scouting a filming location in New Mexico (Todd’s son and then-wife Elizabeth Taylor pictured right). For a time, it looked like Laube’s Scentavision might die with him. But Mike Todd, Jr. was determined to carry out his father’s dream. One year after Todd’s death, production of the first “smellie” began with plans to include 30 different fragrances by way of Laube’s Scentavision.

Todd, Jr. changed the name of the process to Smell-O-Vision. He explained why in Scent of Mystery’s souvenir program: “Many people have asked me why I re-named the Scentavision process Smell-O-Vision! They wonder why, if I was changing the name, I didn’t choose something more ‘dignified.’ I don’t understand how you can be ‘dignified’ about a process that introduces smells into a theater.”

It turns out there was something prophetic about Todd, Jr.’s words.  Asking audiences to sit in a theater seat with a hidden tiny plastic tube pumping out the smell of coffee, garlic, freshly-baked bread, pipe smoke, and shoe-shine wax was neither dignified or, apparently, very fun. Initially the public seemed interested in Smell-O-Vision until they got a whiff of it. Then they left the theaters in droves.

scent3Critics weren’t kind either. Bosley Crowther of the New York Times, dismissed the “novel stimulation.” Crowther wrote, “when this reviewer saw (and smelled) the picture at a full-dress preview the night before last, the Smell-O-Vision squirters weren’t at full blast or his nasal apparatus was on the fritz.” The movie, he concluded, was “bunk.” A reviewer from Time seemed to concur: “Most customers will probably agree that the smell they liked best was the one they got during intermission: fresh air.”

Laube’s elaborately-constructed technique for sending out synchronized blasts of odor to match the action on screen seemed to elicit pinched noses from audiences as well. Word of mouth spread that Scent of Mystery was a bomb and it was yanked. Several years later, it was re-released under the title Holiday in Spain without the faintest trace of odor (as was “The Tale of Old Whiff,” the odor-filled cartoon which accompanied Scent of Mystery). Smell-O-Vision did not linger either. Twenty of Laube’s “smell brains” had been ordered. Now they were junked.

A significant footnote in the history of Smell-O-Vision is a copycat technique called AromaRama that was rushed out at the last second to cash in on the impending “smellomania.” In December, 1959, two months before the opening of Scent of Mystery, a travelogue of China called Behind the Great Wall made its premier in New York City. It featured 31 odors and a slogan: “You must breathe it to believe it!”

Like Smell-O-Vision, AromaRama used a “scent track” to trigger the film’s odors. But there was a crucial difference: AromaRama spread its odors through the theater’s air conditioning system with Freon gas used to diffuse the smells. Unfortunately, it didn’t diffuse all that well—pungent aromas often hung malodorously in the air in a less-than-pleasing way. “A beautiful old pine grove in Peking smells rather like a subway rest room on disinfectant day,” wrote Time.

Smell-O-Vision and AromaRama were doomed to obscurity, just like similarly-elaborate gimmicks which Hollywood executives put to use to lure TV audiences back into movie theaters in the 1950s.   “Are smellies here to stay?” asked Time magazine in late 1959.  “Or are they just another cinema gimmick that will soon be one with the paper goggles of yesteryear?”

scent5In 1981, director John Waters (right) paid homage to the golden-age of legendary Hollywood gimmicks by presenting his latest film Polyester in glorious “Odorama.” Customers entering the movie theater were handed scratch’n'sniff cards and instructed to release the hidden smells at the specially-chosen moments. People familiar with Water’s oeuvre understood the highly dubious nature of this gimmick. Surprisingly, except for a few pungent aromas like the smell of dirty socks, Odorama didn’t leave a bad scent and Polyester became Water’s first commercial success.

As virtual reality technology continues to improve, the aromatic experience will improve as well and extend the viewer’s overall range of perceptions. One thing is for sure: more and more movies will stink on purpose.

Reaching for the Stars When Space Was a Thrill

March 9th, 2010

prelingerbook1This looks like a must for any collectors of space-age memorabilia:  Another Science Fiction:  Advertising the Space Race, 1957-1962 by Megan Prelinger. We are familiar with Megan’s husband Rick’s amazing Prelinger Archives, the premier collection of industrial films from the 50s and 60s.  The accompanying article in the New York Times by science writer Dennis Overbye provides a nice overview of the book along with a multimedia slideshow with images. Check it out..